8.1

60/40 Brand vs Activation

A budget split, roughly 60% to broad-reach brand building and 40% to short-term activation, associated with the strongest long-term business effect.

Binet & Field, The Long and the Short of It, IPA (2013)

What it does

Roughly 60% of budget to broad-reach brand building and 40% to short-term activation produces the strongest long-term business effect across the IPA Databank.

When it breaks

The ratio moves by category. The B2B figure is about 46/54, drawn from fewer than 50 cases, and the authors themselves call it tentative and warn against following it precisely. The database skews to large, mature, well-funded brands; a product starting from zero is not in it.

Case

Adidas' global media director Simon Peel told EffWeek 2019 the brand had been running 23% brand to 77% performance, having credited digital with sales that brand activity actually drove. Their analysis found brand activity drove 65% of sales, and 60% of revenue came from first-time buyers rather than the loyalists their CRM spend targeted.

Marketing Week · Adidas on over-investing in digital ↗
Revenue ↑ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 60/40 brand-led Activation-led Crossover
60/40 Brand vs Activation · 8.1

In the wild

Unchecked · not part of the tier

What people have written about this tool in the last twelve months. A machine found these and nobody has read them. Everything above this line was checked by hand.

    Loading…